Published by ASHRAE | Written by Dr. Andy Pearson
There has probably been more written about possible applications for CO2 as a refrigerant in the last 20 years than about any other refrigerant at any time in the history of mechanical refrigeration.
The classic text “1066 And All That,” a spoof history of England, characterizes all history as either “a good thing” or “a bad thing,” or occasionally “a very good thing” or “a very bad” thing. Here is the same technique used to analyze the prospects for CO2 refrigeration.
CO2 contributes more than any other gas to global warming— this is clearly a bad thing. However, without global warming the earth would be uninhabitable, with an average
surface temperature of –2°F (19°C). This is a very bad thing, so global warming is a good thing provided, as Ralph Waldo Emerson said, we have “moderation in all things, especially moderation.” So CO2 as a substitute for high-GWP HFC refrigerant can help reduce the additional global warming that pushes the thermometer beyond the tolerable band to which we have been accustomed for at least the last thousand years.
CO2 systems have to run at very high pressure, typically eight to 10 times higher than an average ammonia system, for them to be cooled by the surrounding air. Equipment needs to be designed to contain this pressure safely; this is clearly a good but expensive thing. Many people seem to be put off exploring the possibility of using CO2 for this reason, so it has a bad consequence. However, those who persevere and spend the little extra it takes to accommodate higher operating pressures have learned that there are lots of reasons to like CO2—more of this good thing later. One hundred years ago CO2 systems were commonplace, often capable of operating at pressures up to 1,500 psig (over 100 bar gauge), but they were relatively expensive compared to lower pressure refrigerants, so they fell out of favor.
CO2 systems cooled by the surrounding air operate on their high pressure side above the maximum pressure at which the gas can be liquefied by cooling. This is a confusing
thing and has led to a lot of latter-day mythology about these so-called “transcritical” systems. In reality, they are not so different from what we are used to; their major challengeis that the system capacity is greatly reduced on a hot day, which is not just a bad thing, but bad timing, too.
However, this high pressure makes CO2 gas very dense, which delivers the opportunity to do amazing things with system design. Pushing the discharge pressure above the condensing zone results in a temperature drop as the gas cools, but on the low pressure side of the system the temperature remains constant as the liquid evaporates. This is a “best of both worlds” deal: glide on the heating side and no glide on the chiller side—allowing CO2 to be used in high temperature heat pumps very effectively.
High operating pressure delivers the good things about CO2—the small compressor
size, the low pressure loss in suction pipes and the good heat transfer in heat exchangers, so it ought to be welcomed. The high density allows crazy things to be done in the evaporator design department, even for very low temperature systems such as cooling to –50°F (–45°C) without suffering large pressure drop.
I have never yet been able to design a CO2 evaporator that suffered from the circuits being too long, despite trying several times. The circuits are almost impossible to overload, especially in chill applications. As we push toward making system efficiency better, this radical feature of CO2 will be crucial to the success of new system designs. Unfortunately, system designers and particularly evaporator designers are following old rules for old refrigerants and are not capitalizing on this advantage. This is a bad thing, but it is not irredeemable.
Andy Pearson, Ph.D., C.Eng., is Group Managing Director of the Star Refrigeration Group and President of group subsidiary Azane Inc, the leading US manufacturer of low charge ammonia chillers and freezers.
This article was published in ASHRAE Journal, July 2016. Copyright 2016 ASHRAE. Reprinted here by permission from ASHRAE at www.azane-inc.com. This article may not be copied nor distributed in either paper or digital form by other parties without ASHRAE's permission. For more information about ASHRAE, visit www.ashrae.org.